Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Wilco V's avatar

Three things.

A) Back in 2020 the US seized 4 Iranian oil tankers bound for Venezuela, for on the face same reason. Sanctions involving funding of Hezbollah, and Iranian proxy groups (from the justice department: https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/largest-us-seizure-iranian-fuel-four-tankers). And the BBC does report that the Skipper (the current ship) did visit Iran this year. But it is a bit strange as you report it just happens on the day of Machado's 'victory' speech in Oslo. But I say all of this to indicate I doubt the US will stop with seizure of just one oil tanker. Especially when the US government gets to keep any funds produced by the seized property as in the case of the 4 Iranian oil tankers.

B) The mention that Colombia may be next and that Chevron is already in the Venezuela, indicates to me, that the motive for this whole is less about material goods of Venezuela (i.e. oil) but rather personal grievances of the president, not even ideology when the two countries even with Petro as president of Colombia are ideologically similar to one another.

C) If we are to take Machado's word at face value and that an American intervention is actually needed, why would we trust this administration of cowboys? Not one person in this administration is serious about anything outside of being a rancid racist. There isn't even the evil seriousness of say a John Bolton, or Chenney of previous administrations (does anyone think Hesgeth or even Rubio is spending hours thinking about foreign affairs instead of what is woke?). Any intervention done by the US currently, would certainly not end up like Panama '89. And if there is anything we should have learn from the past decades is that a situation no matter how bleak can always become worse; there is no rockbottom.

Expand full comment
Mar's avatar

🥁

🛢️

War drums for drums of oil.

Again.

Expand full comment

No posts

Ready for more?